Author Archives: Kenneth A. Adams

Parsing the Discussion of Drafting Resources in “A Business Lawyer’s Bibliography”

Steven Sholk, that bloodhound, let me know about an article in the current issue of the Journal of Legal Education. It’s by Robert C. Illig, associate professor at the University of Oregon School of Law, and it’s entitled A Business Lawyer’s …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Book Review | 3 Comments

Should Koncision Maintain a List of Koncision-Friendly Lawyers?

Koncision’s confidentiality-agreement template is intended for sophisticated users. No surprise there—contracts can get complicated. So any nonlawyer who wants to use Koncision might well benefit from a lawyer’s input. In this 2011 post I describe how a lawyer might help a …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Our Templates, Process | Leave a comment

Seeking Not-for-Profit to Take Part in Penn Law 2012 Contract-Drafting Project

I’ve re-upped at Penn Law: this fall, a scant twenty JD and LLM students will be taking my course in contract drafting. Once again, I plan on closing out the semester with a drafting, or redrafting, project for a not-for-profit …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Teaching | Leave a comment

Revisiting Alternatives to Imposing Obligations on Nonparties

[Updated 5:30 p.m. EDT, May 15, 2012, to revise what is now the next-to-last bullet point and add a new final bullet point, as well as supplement the closing sentence.] I find myself revisiting a favorite topic: stating in a …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Categories of Contract Language | 14 Comments

Language of Belief?

[Revised 8:00 a.m. EDT, May 13, 2012, prompted by Mark Anderson's comment and a good night's sleep.] Consider the following, culled from the SEC’s EDGAR system: The Parties believe that the provisions of this Agreement are in compliance with the requirements of …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Categories of Contract Language | 2 Comments

“Full Time”—It’s Not Clear Enough

In its recent opinion in In re C.P.Y. (copy here), the Texas Court of Appeals had occasion to consider the phrase “full-time basis,” and it concluded that it’s ambiguous. Youst (the husband) was required to pay Wells (the wife) alimony …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Ambiguity | 6 Comments

Phantom Ambiguity in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania?

On December 1, 2007, AVAX Technologies and one Francois Martelet entered into an employment agreement providing for Martelet to serve as AVAX’s CEO. It all ended in litigation, and recently the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued this …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Ambiguity | 1 Comment

Attachments Terminology: Seeking Input from Outside the U.S.

MSCD notes how in the U.S., traditionally exhibit is used to refer to a stand-alone document that’s attached to a contract, whereas schedule is used to refer to materials that could have been in the body of the contract but …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Back of the Contract | 8 Comments

“Commits To”: Another Half-Baked Way of Stating Obligations

Behold commit to used to express obligations: each of the Guarantors hereby … commits to make a contribution to such Guarantor’s capital in an amount at least equal to The Employee commits to perform his/her duties pursuant to this Agreement on full time …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Categories of Contract Language | Leave a comment

Even More on “Termination”

In this recent post, I discussed a case in which the word “termination” was held not to apply to “expiration” of a contract. Thanks to reader, I learned about a case, Olympus Ins. Co. v. Aon Benfield, Inc., No. 11-CV-2607 …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Select Usages | Leave a comment

Once More, With Feeling: Relaunching My Ebook “The Structure of M&A Contracts”

A little over a year ago I announced publication of my book The Structure of M&A Contracts. Since then, limbo: First, the book was available as a PDF, but only by calling West. Then, it became available exclusively on Thomson …

Continue Reading »

Posted in M&A | Leave a comment

A Nifty Feature of ContractExpress

So far, ContractExpress—the software that powers Koncision’s confidentiality-agreement template—has been able to handle everything I’ve thrown at it. Last week I learned of yet another feature that I expect I’ll need down the road. If your organization uses a number …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Document Assembly | Leave a comment

Contract-Drafting Metrics?

I’m fond of saying that the first step in overhauling your contract process is analyzing the costs and risks of your current process. But what should such an analysis consist of? That question came to mind after my Inside Counsel …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | 2 Comments

Sterilizing an Attached Service-Provider Proposal

Last week I received the following inquiry from a reader: I have a frustrating drafting challenge (possible blog topic?) that I suspect beleaguers many in-house counsel who are trying to streamline contracting processes—using a service provider’s proposal to define the …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Back of the Contract | 2 Comments

Exploring “Joint and Several”

[Revised 1:50 p.m. EDT, April 26, 2012, to reflect comments by Vance, Mike, and Guest. In the original version, I didn't explore the procedural side. And further revised 6:00 a.m. EDT, April 30, 2012, to eliminate the words "joint" and …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Select Usages | 6 Comments

Is What I Do “Opinion”?

Recently on Twitter, Lawrence Hsieh (aka@ContractAdviser) compared me to longtime sports-radio provocateur Mike Francesa. And the next day a reader emailed me to say, among other things, “I like reading your comments but you are, I have to say it, opinionated!” …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Odds and Ends | 14 Comments

ContractExpress QuickStart + Koncision’s NDA Template = Turnkey Contract Automation

I’m in Chicago for the Inside Counsel 2012 SuperConference. I’ll be on a panel later today; go here for the agenda. But that’s not what this post is about. Instead, I wanted to mention that Business Integrity has launched ContractExpress …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Our Templates, Process | Leave a comment

The U.S. Supreme Court Dabbles in Part-Versus-the-Whole Ambiguity

In an opinion issued this week (here) the U.S. Supreme Court considered the alternative possible meanings of “not an.” Here’s the relevant passage: Truth be told, the answer to the general question “What does ‘not an’ mean?” is “It depends”: …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Ambiguity | 1 Comment

Some Thoughts on the ACC’s “Contract Advisor”

Last week saw the launch of the ACC’s “Contract Advisor.” Lawrence Hsieh (aka @ContractAdviser—no relation!) craftily suggested on Twitter that he was looking forward to hearing my views on Contract Advisor. Now here I am, taking the bait. That’s because …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | Leave a comment

Certification in Contract Drafting?

I’d like to revisit a notion that I alluded to in this brief 2010 post on AdamsDrafting: offering certification in contract drafting. Here’s how it would work: Contracts professionals could get a certificate of proficiency in drafting and review of …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | 5 Comments